Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 28,980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2022, 7:33 am
Have the children lived in New York? [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:05 am
Karkkainen v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 3:53 am
In 1967, the United States Supreme Court decision in Loving v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm
The more recent was Washington v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
It was also agreed that, regardless of where the couple might later live, the agreement should be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such… [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:49 pm
Adams v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Take New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Baures v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 9:59 am
Monsey v Town of Ramapo, (Sup Ct Rockland Co. [read post]
7 May 2009, 10:44 am
G.H. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:58 am
Delaware Representative Michael Ramone (R) for sponsoring successful legislation to repeal the state’s short-lived estate tax, which had raised little revenue and was widely seen as driving wealthy retirees out of state. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:36 am
Under Sternberg v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:51 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:16 pm
[Spain] [Consent] [Petition Denied] In Caro v Sanchez, 2013 WL 5300671 (D.N.J.) [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 7:27 am
[Colombia] [Petition granted] In Ruiz v Zinsou, 2022 WL 3931454, (N.D. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Removal projects have included the use of benthic matting/barriers over EWM beds, which have proven effective at smothering and containing EWM, but which are also indiscriminate killers of other native aquatic plants and may also harm animals living in or on the lakebed being covered. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Removal projects have included the use of benthic matting/barriers over EWM beds, which have proven effective at smothering and containing EWM, but which are also indiscriminate killers of other native aquatic plants and may also harm animals living in or on the lakebed being covered. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
