Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 13,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2016, 12:35 pm
Today, fortunately, has a theme.It's Bad Attorney Day.From the state side, we have this opinion. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 5:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:08 pm
The Supreme Court ruled today in a unanimous decision that a party who wins a preliminary injunction but loses at summary judgment cannot be a "prevailing party" and awarded attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. 1988. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:27 pm
Interestingly enough, if Cuccinelli loses in the fall, the Democrat Terry McAuliffe will be substituted for the main defendant, and this major precedent would then be coined Bostic v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:21 am
Then, in Webster v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:48 am
Although Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:30 am
Photo from Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0).On Monday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a ruling in California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
The state then automatically loses. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Whew, losing steam. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:04 am
" Lipani v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
State v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:24 pm
That's simply not a "state-sponsored message of hostility" towards a particular religion. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:59 pm
On its face, Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
Version 1.0 of the panel opinion contained an unfortunate, oblique reference to Microsoft v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
Romania, no. 42250/02, 1 July 2008 and Frodl v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:30 am
County Court judges tend to take a reasonably robust approach and decide that ‘exceptional’ connotes something more than the usual hardship that would be suffered by a tenant that loses their home. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
" After a hearing, the State Board revoked the doctor's license.While the doctor raised an array of technical objections by way of an Article 78 proceeding, the Appellate Division, Third Department, ultimately concluded that the penalty did not "shock one's sense of fairness" and left the revocation undisturbed.Frankly, it would have been shocking if the AD3 had concluded otherwise.For a copy of Appellate… [read post]
