Search for: "State v. Quick" Results 1861 - 1880 of 4,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2022, 5:53 pm by Richard Hunt
The case is also interesting because it was brought entirely under California state law. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:10 am by Michelle Yeary
  The decision on appeal is the Fifth Circuit’s Mississippi v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The plaintiffs aggregation theory is reminiscent of the 1949 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Standard Oil Co. of California v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:36 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The New York Times reports on Judge Walker’s new decision in Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am by Nicole Huberfeld
  For those sane enough not to engage in the reading of tea leaves that is deciphering the spending power, a quick review. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
The court undertook a state-by-state analysis of all 22 states – Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida (citing a case we sent to Westlaw), Georgia, Illinois (rejecting Dolin v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:54 am
Following the discussion of Molineux, the use of prior bad act evidence against a defendant at trial, Gideon at A Public Defender posted an exceptional discussion of the Connecticut Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 9:19 pm
A few thoughts after a quick read: 1) The personal jurisdiction analysis as to the Mitchell Commission and Sports Illustrated claims takes a very narrow approach to Calder v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Guerrero-Lasprilla v. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 6:57 am
As always, the Lexicon provides a quick and dirty summary with an eye to law students (especially first-year law students) with an interest in legal theory. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Stalling is something else: even though the Chief Justice of the United States had granted Samsung an extension until March 29 for a petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]