Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,917
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
Board famously invalidated school segregation under the Equal Protection Clause without even trying to determine the full extent to which that Clause banned racial discrimination by state governments. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:04 am
Virginia State Board of Elections, the plaintiffs claimed that 12 historically majority-minority state districts in Virginia drawn to ensure that African-American voters constituted at least 55 percent of the voting population in each district violated the equal protection clause. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am
Fairfax County School Board, 23-170 Issue: Whether the Fairfax County School Board violated the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause when it overhauled the admissions criteria at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 2:50 pm
Harper v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
It will even run off it’s own on-board rechargeable battery for total flexibility of use. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
Clayton County, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 8:42 am
[i]Hernandez- Ortiz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 7:05 am
But in Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:23 pm
Such reasoning is not unprecedented: Recall FDA v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
”[9] Once the nominating stockholder submits its notice, all stockholders would then have equal access on a timely basis to communications made by the nominating stockholder. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Berryhill, a state Board of Optometrists, comprised exclusively of optometrists in private practice for their own account, was going to hold hearings against optometrists employed by a corporation. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:56 pm
Consider United States v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 1:37 pm
’[5]Terri Peretti has noted that ‘[t]he loss of distinguished politicians on the [US Supreme] Court risks its representational qualities and its effectiveness as a policy maker and co-equal branch of government. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm
Here I explore Hak v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:08 am
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:52 pm
State Board of Land and Natural Resources - the shifting sands of the definition of "shoreline" Brescia v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:15 pm
In other words, I see this case like Locke v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
We affirmed their convictions in United States v. [read post]
