Search for: "State v. Strange"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2006, 3:29 pm
One of the disgraces of the Supreme Court's opinion in Palmer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm
Strangely, the 2023 Merger Guidelines forswear any attempt at predicting merger effects, stating that “the Agencies do not attempt to predict the future . [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm
Strangely enough, I think everyone will be excited by the content, even your brothers. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Piacentile v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:00 pm
As re-organized for enactment in the United States, all mandatory requirements have been grouped in this section. [read post]
22 May 2021, 7:12 am
No, I don't want to gloat, but it's mind-boggling what happened yesterday in that Oakland courtroom at the end of the main part (they're done apart from closing arguments on Monday) of the Epic Games v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:00 am
Class actions are strange and dangerous things. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:18 am
On the one hand, this has broadly overlooked the peculiarly public role of those denominational schools recognised and funded by the State under the Education Act 1998 – in this light, they essentially represent the conduits for the provision of public education in this state, and should belong in the “public” sphere for constitutional purposes. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
When I posed this hypothetical to a faculty colleague, I was advised that the courts would undoubtedly find a way to avoid such a strange construction.) [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
” The video is still strangely relevant (change Nader with Jill Stein and the same thing applies today). [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In addition, there is a risk that a lawyer may not provide the independent advice and representation necessary to ensure the proper administration of justice (See, e.g., Regular v Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador 2011 NLCA 54). [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 6:15 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
In State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
(National Restaurant Association v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
(National Restaurant Association v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
But courts do the interpreting under the court order standard, so diversity of state laws is not the issue.) [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
