Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 10:05 am
Sofa Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
The plaintiff demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the first cause of action by tendering invoices for services rendered prior to December 5, 2006, setting forth his hourly rate, the billable hours expended, and the particular services rendered, and establishing that the defendant signed such invoices, failed to timely object to the invoices, and made partial payments thereon (see Landa v Dratch, 45 AD3d 646, 648; Landa v Sullivan, 255… [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
Celebrity LeveragingRobert Raskopf, partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP was up after the coffee break discussing the exploitation of celebrity rights in the US. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The trial court entered judgment in favor of the City and the Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed in City of Sullivan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:10 am
Sullivan to chill civil rights speech. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:12 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Sullivan Award given annually to the top amateur athlete in the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:58 pm
The court stated that it “is particularly troubled by” some of the FDIC’s assertions. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 4:10 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.courts.state.ny.us/reporter/3dseries/2010/2010_09227.htm [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm
Davis argued on the losing side of Brown v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
R (Guardian News and Media) v City of Westminster Magistrates [2010] EWHC 3376 (Admin) – 21 December 2010, Admin Court (Sullivan LJ and Silber J). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 1:28 am
The law would seem to support my initial reaction: New York Times v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:56 pm
A full explanation of their analysis can be found in the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:57 am
We argue that the underlying logic of Parker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 7:58 am
We argue in the brief that even if a state can be permitted to enact anticompetitive laws under Parker v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
It is clear that the test which the court must apply to ensure that the proceedings are not prohibitively expensive remains in a state of uncertainty. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:01 pm
CDR Cave will be a guest; Colonel Sullivan plans to participate as well, although he may be a little late calling in. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am
Colonel Sullivan is of the opinion that there may be several fruitful avenues for rebuttal in this case. [read post]
