Search for: "State v. Twist" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
In a lawsuit that was originally filed in 2013 titled, Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:33 am by Jeff Gamso
  Moyer quoted a passage from Judge Jerome Frank's dissent in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:10 am by Bob Bauer
Doubtless they were constrained by a powerful democratic norm, reflected in the Supreme Court’s pointed rejection in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Keith E. Whittington
” Otherwise, the Constitution “is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary, which they may twist and shape into any form they please. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm by Bill Marler
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm by Sam Murrant
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:21 am
  The WSJ includes pdf links to the moving papers: Here are the three motions to dismiss for: failure to state an offense, vagueness and unconstitutional delegation of prosecutorial power. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am by Dylan Gibbs
The presiding judge met privately with state attorneys and a state witness. [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:28 am by SHG
Wally, ever the optimist, hopes that circuit court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In an interesting twist, at the end of her opinion, Judge Scheindlin added an “Addendum” in which she “ordered” the plaintiffs “to show cause by August 31, 2012 why their negligent misrepresentation claims against the Rating Agencies should not be dismissed” based on the Second Circuit’s August 14, 2012 opinion in Anschutz Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 4:22 am by SHG
He began, as so many do these days, with the Supreme Court’s shadow docket decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]