Search for: "State v. W" Results 1861 - 1880 of 15,631
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It holds the plaintiff in this case cannot sue the United States Tennis Association because the USTA was not a joint employer with the security company that hired him and assigned him to work tennis matches in New York.The case is Felder v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The timing of the SEC's decision is interesting because the Supreme Court's pending decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
On Friday 11 March the Supreme Court will hear an assessment of costs hearing in Secretary of State for Health and another v Servier Laboratories Ltd and others, on appeal from [2019] EWCA Civ 1096. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
District Judge Stephen Friot, who was appointed to the bench in 2001 by President George W. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
 In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]