Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 1861 - 1880 of 4,765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
” Sidestepping the general question of extraterritorial interpretation, the court instead pointed to its 2013 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
 The claim arises out of a broadcast of Can’t Pay? [read post]
29 May 2017, 9:43 am by Richard Symmes
Creditors and debt collectors can try to collect expired debt forever by calling or writing letters, but there are laws in place to protect consumers. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
An application by Channel 5 for summary judgment in a privacy claim brought against it arising from a broadcast of Can’t Pay? [read post]
26 May 2017, 12:22 pm by Theodore R. Flo
How would it be, he questioned, if she ran on a consumer protection platform, got elected, and was stuck with a Trump-appointed CFPB director, who would presumably take a much different position on issues central to her platform? [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:56 pm by kerry.sheehan
And, when we don’t know exactly what we give up when we “buy” digital goods, we’re not making an informed choice. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The MMPA is “ ‘paternalistic legislation designed to protect those that could not otherwise protect themselves,’ ” High Life Sales Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Rachel Tarko Hudson
There could be protected trademarks appearing in the background or on clothing. [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Rachel Tarko Hudson
There could be protected trademarks appearing in the background or on clothing. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am by Jeffrey Rosen
In Administering the Fourth Amendment in the Digital Age, Jim Harper critiques the limited privacy protections provided by current Fourth Amendment doctrine and calls on courts to adopt a new approach—one guided by Justice Pierce Butler’s forgotten dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]