Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 8,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, et. al., No. 19-cv-10976 (D. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
Turning to the pleadings, the Court found that the plaintiff had failed to plead a class whose members had claims united by common questions of law and fact – the “commonality” requirement. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:19 pm
City of New York, et al., 15 Civ. 9224, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 10:20 am
We proved that our client’s United States Citizen husband and his United States Citizen parents would suffer exceptional hardship if she returned to her home country of Canada to fulfill the two-year foreign residency requirement and if her husband et al were to relocate to Canada with her. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:04 am
Concepcion, et al., Case No. 1:18CV20875-KMM (S.D. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:30 am
United States of America et al Se ha definido las peleas de gallo como un “deporte” donde se crían gallos de pelea y se entrenan para combate a muerte entre dos de ellos. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:04 pm
The qui tam case is docketed as United States, et al. ex rel. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 10:22 am
City Of New York , et al – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – November 12th, 2019) involves a claim of injuries sustained by the plaintiff after an altercation with the New York City Police Department (NYPD). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:50 pm
CMS acknowledges the ruling in American Hospital Association et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Not only should the First Amendment apply to the publication by Assange of Manning leaks – after all such publication was not dissimilar from that of the New York Times, the Guardian, et. al. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:17 pm
The lawsuit, Almerico et al. v. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:35 am
Drew Hirschfeld, Commissioner for Patents at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
Smith & Nephew Inc. et al., case number 18-2140, the U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
Smith & Nephew Inc. et al., case number 18-2140, the U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
It has come to this because of the unwillingness on the part of the United States to agree to the appointment of replacements for the members of the Appellate Body (“AB”) who have completed their terms. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Targeted infrastructure funding is partly addressed by a Senate appropriations bill that devotes $690 million in fiscal year (FY) 2020 funding for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS) broadband loan and grant programs (presumably including the ReConnect program). [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm
The Kraft Heinz Co. et al. in the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 1:55 pm
See United States v. [read post]
