Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 4,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2008, 5:12 pm
Consider then, the alleged infringing "Bodyfat Analyzer and Scale" products in the recent suit, Tanita Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 8:48 am
Cook v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 4:09 am
Suffice it to note that Civil Service Law §209-a.2(c) provides that it is an "Improper employee organization practices" to breach its duty of fair representation to public employees under this article [fourteen, the Taylor Law]. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 8:58 pm
Stuart Taylor Jr. of National Journal and Newsweek as the moderator. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:03 am
In Special v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:32 am
” In Walden PERB observed that the Taylor Law agreement was silent as to such payments and found that they had been extended to disabled officers “only pursuant to a practice developed over time. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:57 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Vidal v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 12:57 pm
Taylor, 2006 U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 9:30 am
The case, Florists' Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:27 pm
(Thanks, Lawrence Taylor, for posting on all topics contained in this blog entry). [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:59 pm
Today’s case (Dosanjh v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 am
” (State Compensation Insurance Fund v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:00 am
Al Jazeera has more on the beginning of the trial we mentioned yesterday before the ECHR, El Masri v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 4:17 am
From the recent Maclean’s decision: "The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:09 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:07 am
Gumwood’s complaint in Gumwood HP Shopping Partners LP v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:42 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993), and discussed in Taylor v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
Supreme Court should have granted the petition in Proceeding No. 2 to permanently stay arbitration.Comment: The Plattsburgh case [Plattsburgh v Plattsburgh Police Officers Union, 250 AD2d 327, leave to appeal denied: 93 NY2d 807], illustrates this. [read post]
