Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 55,027
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 8:00 am
Yesterday I began discussing how a victim would go about proving that the landlord could "foresee" the crime - which is what Georgia law requires in order to hold a property owner or property manager liable for failing to keep people safe on the property. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 12:34 am
Brigit Morris was a legal officer at the Australian Law Reform Commission. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:51 am
The Native American Experience through Poetry, the Law, and MemoirWriters: Louis V. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
The court based its findings on, among other evidence, two expert reports and it found that Terentyev had negatively influenced public opinion “with the aim of inciting social hatred and enmity, escalating social conflict and controversy in society and awakening base instincts in people”, calling for the “physical extermination” of police officers by ordinary people. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm
The Court confirmed that the trial judge was correct to hold that such allegations would tend to have a substantial adverse effect (Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Limited [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) [98]) on the way that people would treat Mr Millet. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 6:59 am
Instructive case law comes from Tidenberg v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 8:28 am
Fortunately, it’s not even close to the law. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 9:27 am
As a long-time teacher of Administrative Law I’m continually amazed that people say Ad Law is dull. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 6:48 am
[N.Y.Criminal Procedure Law] §§ 100.40, 100.15 People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 6:32 am
The case most commonly referred to by the Colorado family law community for this standard is People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The People have the initial burden of going forward to show the “lack of any undue suggestiveness” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990]; People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 [1997]). [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:08 pm
Robbery and theft are distinct crimes under California law. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Yet the Supreme Court, in Dickerson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
The proper construction of s 1(1) The background to this issue, and to the enactment of s 1(1), is the judgment in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414, in which Tugendhat J considered that there was a “threshold of seriousness” recognised under common law, and in which he favoured a definition that a statement was defamatory if it “… substantially affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Harrison v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:42 am
In SONY BMG Music v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
For instance, Google published images of Trkulja alongside Melbourne criminal identities when people searched “Melbourne criminal underworld”. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
Rather, we leave them to be decided by thedistrict court in first instance.Of the law surrounding the first issue:Whether a juryinstruction on an issue of patent law is erroneous is amatter of Federal Circuit law that is reviewed de novo.Sulzer Textil A.G. v. [read post]
