Search for: "The People v. Cross"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 5,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am
” See People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:01 pm
West filed a public records request action against the City and Vermillion.West, the City, and Vermillion filed cross-motions for summary judgment. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
In February 2009, S was convicted in Reading Crown Court for violent offences committed during an unprovoked attack on four people in September 2006. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:16 am
This contrasted with a more applicant-oriented description of the scheme given by Sedley LJ in R (Saadat) v Rent Service [2002] HLR 32: The fundamental purpose of the housing benefit scheme … is to ensure that people who are not under-occupying property and not over-paying rent are not made homeless through genuine inability to pay. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 5:18 am
On cross-examination, asked if it would have been simpler for a hacker to have put the images on the computer rather than a virus, Garner said `it would not be simpler. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:37 am
But it also appears that they've included the beginnings of cross-referencing between cases and journal articles. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
But the Court’s religiosity also emerges in nominally non-religion controversies, including Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:32 am
(People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm
It is settled that an accused's right to cross-examine witnesses and present a criminal defense is not absolute nor can the Sixth Amendment be read to "confer the right to present testimony free from the legitimate demands of the adversarial system as ruled in United States v Nobles and Michigan v Lucas. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:45 am
In 1868, the Court of Common Pleas heard the case of Chorlton v Lings where, as was feared by some MPs, it was argued that the Interpretation Act 1850 provided the term “man” in the Representation of the People Act 1867 “shall be deemed and taken to include females … unless the contrary is expressly provided” and meant that women who otherwise met the eligibility requirements could vote. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
It’s a cross-regulatory problem. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
On 25 February 2017, the Novia Scotia Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal against the award of damages in the case of Marson v Nova Scotia, 2017 NSCA 17 Denmark A Danish appeals court has upheld a defamation ruling and a 10,000-krone fine given to the Danish People’s Party, a populist party which supports the centre-right government. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:25 am
People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 4:22 am
, in People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm
In Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
The States that have sought to intervene in Ukraine v. [read post]
