Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States" Results 1861 - 1880 of 4,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Among the amici urging the Court simply to overrule Flast v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that the United States will formally withdraw from the Paris climate agreement. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
” In relation to the fact of the relationship the Court of Appeal rejected the view that this was an exceptional situation under the test set out in the House of Lords decision in Cream Holdings v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
An “Officer of the United States” is, according to the Supreme Court, “any appointee exercising significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Henry Barrett
Many point to the European Union as a bastion for ‘third way’ media co-regulation—balancing China’s authoritarian grip on expression and the United States’ unrestricted accommodations for free speech. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm by Ben
 Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
Goodman, Rutgers Law School, Ryan Whittington, German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF). [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Benjamin Alter
At the same time, the United States is increasingly relying on economic coercion to advance its interests. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 5:03 pm
Article 1, Section 6, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution states: No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been encreased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either… [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Margaret Taylor
If enacted, it would “direct[] the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran or any part of its government or military” within 30 days “unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force[,]” though it excludes efforts to “defend [the United States] from imminent attack. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 9:04 am by Dwight Sullivan
This week at the CCAs:  On Thursday, NMCCA will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:47 am by Pamela
James Smith will prefile a bill today in the SC House of Representatives that would ban texting while driving. [read post]