Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 11:23 am
This post summarizes an opinion issued by the United States Supreme Court on June 15, 2020. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
United States Postal Service, the court held 6-3 that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:15 am
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two cases involving attorney’s fees in patent cases. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
The Court set out the three factor test noted in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 11:34 am
"Obama v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:58 pm
Mark Martins, had this to say on the eve of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
There, the question was whether the logo was an official insignia falling with Section 2(b), i.e., was it “of the same class as the flag or coats of arms of the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Rev. 1185 (2023)) on SSRN> Here is the abstract: A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
Corporacion Habanos, S.A. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:06 pm
Levine (20) Why wacky warnings matter (10) Vioxx: Mark Lanier’s smears of the Ernst v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:31 am
Here in SHAHRAM DAVID LAVIAN, -v.- IRA DANIEL TOKAYER, ESQ., 08 Civ. 938 (PAC) (GWG); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am
At the New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin discusses the impact of Chief Justice John Roberts on the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 9:55 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:20 pm
Now, only the United States may sue for statutory damages.A new private suit provision (35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:20 am
A United States Federal District Court in Texas recently discussed the above in a case. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” United Mine Workers v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
* No More (Trade Mark) Trouble With Harry (Winston) Marie-Andrée recounts the melting tale of the Winston family, where Harry built up a worldwide famous jewellery company in 1932 which now tries to prevent his son Bruce from registering his own name and surname as a trade mark for jewellery with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
