Search for: "United States v. Michigan"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 3,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 1:40 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:32 pm
Michigan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:46 pm
Access THE QB-Lu research paper on CFC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:44 am
As Wikipedia notes, ineffective assistance is a claim raised by a convicted criminal defendant that their attorney’s performance was so ineffective that it deprived them of the constitutional right guaranteed by the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am
At JURIST, Eric Segall discusses Fisher in the context of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:59 am
While the appeal was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided the Dukes case. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
Wrong Burt LancasterThe United States Supreme Court recently decided Metrish v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:43 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:42 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:40 pm
The Mingo Logan Coal Company (Mingo Logan) applied to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) for a permit under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to discharge dredged or fill material from a mountain-top coal mine in West Virginia into three streams and their tributaries. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:38 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:04 am
Michigan Mut. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:07 am
At his jury trial in Michigan state court, Lancaster asserted a defense of diminished capacity. [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:24 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Social media behemoth Facebook and an Oregon ad agency have been sued for copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.] in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the company that licenses and manages the music of 40-year-old rapper/songwriter Eminem (Marshall Bruce Mathers III).In the Complaint filed May 20, Eight Mile Style, LLC & Martin Affiliated LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:09 am
These questions have not been clearly resolved in this particular context under United States law. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In the 1964 case of Bouie v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:31 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana. [read post]
