Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 1861 - 1880 of 7,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2016, 7:18 pm by Nora Demleitner
United States, which declared the Johnson rule substantive for purposes of the retroactivity analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:02 am by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
In a November, 2013 decision published on March 10th of this year, in what appears to be the first decision of its kind not only in New Jersey but in the United States, a Superior Court judge in the matter of Plotnick v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am by Girardeau Spann
This is largely deliberate, reflecting the relatively low priority that incon­venient racial equality is typically accorded by United States culture. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am by INFORRM
   In England and any other common law jurisdiction (outside the United States), the damages would, at most have been in the low tens of thousands of pounds. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
The benefits were potentially great, and the impact on Mr Bridges was minor, and so the use of AFR was proportionate under Article 8(2) ([143]). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day TracFone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 6:21 am by Kirk M. Hartung
The Applicant appealed the examiner’s rejection to the Patent Office Trial and Appeal Board, which affirmed the examiner, stating that the differences between the lip implant and the art stump were minor. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
 The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
 The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]