Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 1861 - 1880 of 3,229
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm by Jackie McDermott
“When somebody’s the president of the United States, the authority is total,” Trump said. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm by Paul A. Prados
Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990), which the Supreme Court explicitly overruled in Citizens United, 130 S.Ct. at 913. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:50 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
  He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument on a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:57 am by Lyle Denniston
Lopez in 1995 and United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:16 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court is considering the scope of Congress’s treaty power, and contends that the Chief Justice’s opinions in cases involving foreign affairs “might have lasting significance for foreign relations law that rivals or even surpasses” those of other Justices regarded as leaders in the field. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:23 am
A Petition for Certiorari has been filed in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:44 am by Russ Bensing
  The case came up through habeas, and under the standards applicable to that review, the Michigan courts’ decision couldn’t be reversed unless it was “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
  Before joining Linde, he managed domestic and international automotive product liability for DaimlerChrysler Corporation, litigated civil disputes at Feeney Kellett Wiener & Bush in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, and served as an Assistant United States Attorney in Detroit.] [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am by Matthew Bush
App.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Michigan et al.Reply of petitioner Coleman v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:16 am by Sean Minahan
United States, Dow Chemical sued the United States after the EPA took aerial photographs of Dow’s chemical plant in Midland, Michigan. [read post]