Search for: "United States v. Wells"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 28,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
S. ____ (2023) 1 ALITO, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 22A901 _________________ DANCO LABORATORIES, LLC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
JAMES MADISON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES5 U.S. 137; 2 L. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 9:00 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:22 pm
Gilstrap--whose more formal title is Chief United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas--handed down a scheduling order in the Ericsson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
Well, it has finally happened. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 10:03 am
In an 8-0 decision[1] issued March 25, 2014 in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:31 am
State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court at one time interpreted the clause to bar admission of out-of-court statements that lacked adequate indicia of reliability (Ohio v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 4:23 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:08 am
Army Corps of Engineers redefining the term “Waters of the United States” in the CWA violated the Act as well as the Administrative Procedure Act; and the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Relatives . . . well . . . come to think of it, relatives are better.But in United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:25 pm
We must also conserve critical State Department resources so that consular officers may continue to provide services to United States citizens abroad. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:54 pm
Geographic COVID-19 Restrictions The geographic COVID-19-related P.P.s 9984, 9992, and 10143, which suspend entry into the United States of foreign nationals who have been physically present in the People’s Republic of China, Islamic Republic of Iran, Schengen Area, United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland, Brazil, and South Africa, in the 14-day period before seeking entry into the United States, continue to remain in effect. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:03 pm
United States, many commentators have said, in effect, that criminal prosecutions for insider trading are alive and well. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 8:21 am
Freedom from Religion Foundation v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Broad coverage of the same-sex marriage cases, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 8:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
