Search for: "Urbanic v. Urbanic" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Arielle Harris
” SB 118: UC Enrollment Changes Not A CEQA “Project” Senate Bill 118 was the State Legislature’s targeted response to Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:55 am by admin
Fletcher (known as Buddy) was in a long-term relationship with Hobart V. [read post]
Notably, CMS clarifies there would be no change to the indirect medical education intern-resident-to-bed ratio cap for these urban teaching hospitals. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm by WIMS
Whether they are in rural or urban districts, Americans clearly believe that Congress should be doing what's best for public health, not polluters. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Lawrence W. Sherman
As an assistant to New York City’s then-Police Commissioner, Patrick V. [read post]
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has altered dramatically the… [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
Most people in the West have heard but do not understand the concept of Socialist Modernization as a fundamental policy in China. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:33 am by Emma Snell
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS Following the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm by INFORRM
The Victorian Court of Appeal dismissed three appeals by the Lower Murray Urban and Rural Water Corporation after it lost three defamation actions and was ordered to pay $70,000 damages and costs. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 1:50 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Denver Urban Renewal Authority, 646 P.2d 900 (Colo.1982); Restatement (Second) of Contracts §§ 2 and 90 (1981). [read post]