Search for: "Walker v. State" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:56 am by Paul Horwitz
 One needn't expect more, I suppose, but it's not exactly high-order journalism -- more a skillful use of the ctrl-V function. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
One of the sources named was the proceeds of the sale of 65 Walker Avenue, Sag Harbor, NY 11963. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
The article quotes one official:“Both black and white students lost an opportunity because of the state’s decision, and both deserve this aid,” said Brenda Edwards, who administers the Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
  This will be heard by Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lords Mance, Collins and Clarke. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 2:53 am by Mike
Both cases follow Cadder v HMA [2010] UKSC 43 which involved a detainee being interviewed by the police without access to legal advice. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 2:53 am by Mike
Both cases follow Cadder v HMA [2010] UKSC 43 which involved a detainee being interviewed by the police without access to legal advice. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
That state constitutional amendment barred same-sex marriage in the state, and Judge Walker's decision found Proposition 8 to be inconsistent with the federal constitution. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:01 am by John Steele
(Slightly off topic)  In Nevada Commission on Ethics v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Some 44 years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the landmark case, Loving v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
  Both he and Lady Hale (at §70) cited D v Home Office [2006] 1 WLR 1003 apparently with approval which required a causation test as regards breaches of the 2001 Rules. [read post]