Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 1861 - 1880 of 4,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
The Department of Water Resources (DWR) is the agency defending the action for the state, represented by the Attorney General. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United Debt Holdings, LLC (Debt Collection; Tribal Exhaustion) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.htmlState in Interest of M.D. [read post]
5 May 2011, 7:26 am by Russell Jackson
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) -- also cited by plaintiffs -- the court cautioned that: The State's power over the beds of navigable waters remains subject to only one limitation:  the paramount power of the United States to ensure that such waters remain free to interstate and foreign commerce. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
City of El Paso  (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.html Mitchell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
 See: http://municipalminute.ancelglink.com/2017/07/court-upholds-ordinance-prohibiting.html In Youngberg v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 11:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The most recent decision of this type was last Monday, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
   In fact, the United States Fifth Circuit previously determined that the same exact gambling boat, the M/V Crown, was not a vessel. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:59 pm by Randall Reese
Earlier today, United States Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon of the District of Delaware Bankruptcy Court entered an order dismissing the involuntary chapter 11 bankruptcy petition filed against Hotel Equity Fund V, LLC. [read post]
3 May 2012, 11:56 am by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Alabama v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:24 am by Court C. VanTassell
The Court affirmed that the landowners’ state law claims were not preempted by CERLCA, but restoration damages must actually be used to restore the property Section 113(b) of CERCLA provides that “United States district courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all controversies arising under this chapter. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]