Search for: "Wolfe v. Wolfe" Results 1861 - 1880 of 2,146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 5: Audiovisual works – derivative uses – multimedia e-books This proposed class would allow circumvention of access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures used in connection with multimedia e-book authorship. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
It sounds tranquil, but she was in the midst of reading a beast of a judgment from Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in the ongoing Virgin Atlantic saga in Virgin Atlantic v Zodiac [2013] EWCA Civ 1713. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
And it might become even trickier, Eleonora explains in this post, should the CJEU agree upon the Advocate General (AG) Cruz Villalón’s Opinion in Case C-441/13 Pez Hejduk v EnergieAgentur.NRW GmbH. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:43 am by Ben
De Wolfe has published an orchestral arrangement of Kenya’s national anthem that it states was created in 1990. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
Ohio 1964); that the protections provided by the Fourth Amendment bind the states (Wolf v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm by Chuck Cosson
  For stories that tell of the ‘rise of the machines’ with foreboding are not about man v. machines at all, but about conflict within humanity, and whether it possesses the collective self-love needed for its own self-preservation, or whether shame, greed, and ignorance shall produce division and ruin.[3] And so, making space for human agency requires we supplement the goal of efficiency (at which machines may often excel) with other goals. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm by Jordan Brunner
” Daniel Bynam asked whether lone wolf terrorists can be stopped. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:48 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
The core of the seditious conspiracy offense, as the Supreme Court held in the 1886 case Baldwin v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am by Ben
The case is Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon & Ors [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch). [read post]