Search for: "ANSWER OF THE JUSTICES TO THE COUNCIL"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Baxter Healthcare (filed by Brinker 12/20/11) Real Parties' Answer to California Employment Law Council's Post-Argument Amicus Brief (filed 01/03/12) Brinker's Answer to California Employment Law Council's Post-Argument Amicus Brief (filed 01/04/12) Real Parties' Reply to Brinker's Answer to California Employment Law Council's Post-Argument Amicus Brief (filed 01/13/12) Brinker's Reply to Real Parties'… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 10:59 pm
The Houses of Parliament ready for some evidenceon the unified patent proposals Last Wednesday the IPKat informed readers that the AmeriKat would be forgoing any prospect of birthday joy in favor of attending the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee’s oral evidence hearing on the unitary patent and unified patent court proposals (see previous posts on Committee here). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:31 pm
And you, a Hungarian Jew that lived through being a part of the Nazi’s own Jewish Council that carried out acts against Jews during the war. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:34 am
If justice is to be seen to be done then some more sophisticated system of monitoring must be seriously and urgently considered. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
"But modern public preferences and purchasing decisions are based not only on sensory perceptions, but also on concerns related to latent or unknown health risks, animal welfare, faith, political concerns, social justice and environmental impacts. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
While “public importance” may be the reason cited by the Supreme Court, I like to think that the justices of the Supreme Court find eminent domain law as fascinating and enjoyable as the rest of us, and therefore could not forego the opportunity to contribute to this area of the law in 2011. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
We now come to some of the current problems in the areas of society for which alternative dispute resolution may have some answers. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:07 pm
The 7-0 decision, authored by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, shows just how wrong such predictions can be. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:16 pm
The bill was sponsored by the State Bar of California Committee on Administration of Justice. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:25 am
OSHA found that the pilot did not refuse to answer any questions during the hearing, answers to questions were appropriate, and the action taken by the airline was retaliatory. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am
Hint for those challenged since high school by multiple-choice tests: The answer is not (d). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:31 am
I expect to see the Local Commander and Local Senior officer coming before the council to explain and answer questions about police and fire services in the area. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 12:21 pm
If the former Lord Advocate does appear in court to answer questions over the arrest of Mr Green and account for her role in the Hollie Greig case, it will be a first. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:22 am
European Council decides on accession of the European Union to the Athens Protocol;Austria: Supreme Court decides on innkeeper's liability with regard to theft from hotel garage;USA: DOT fines AirTran for deceptive price advertising;European Economic and Social Committee: opinion on tourism in Europe published;USA: man who helped to stop "underwear bomber" sues for USD 10 million;IFTTA Law Review 3-2011 now available;European Court of Justice: The directive including… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:52 am
Glasgow law firm Levy McRae who later represented shamed former Glasgow City Council Boss & Cocaine addict Steven Purcell, proceeded to threaten several media outlets & journalists over their reporting of the case, covered by Scottish Law Reporter HERE & HERE. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:56 pm
He says that you can trust the Council. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:34 am
Her answers do not, however, allay our concerns about the international agreement, and so we do not propose to release the document from scrutiny. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
On June 28, the Court granted review, but changed the question it would answer to make it clear that the Due Process issue was very much a part of the case. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:17 pm
Here I think the answer has to be “yes. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:03 pm
If local justice for Saif now goes awry on the ICC’s watch, the International Court itself will have much to answer for. [read post]
