Search for: "AT&T"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 881,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 pm
It can’t have been easy to make this happen – NYC has a particularly enormous and stubborn bureaucracy, and I’m confident the city didn’t provide a simple path for AT&T. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 11:17 am
If you don’t start, you can’t fail; you can’t succeed either [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 3:09 pm
The post Tyler Beall, Gillian Felix, Krishna Gohel, Tim Maffett, Sabrina Marquez, Robert T. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:12 am
Crowther Duane Morris Takeaways: In a data breach class action entitled In Re T-Mobile Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, Nos. 23-2944 & 23-2798, 2024 WL 3561874 (8th Cir. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:27 pm
"I can't say I didn't do it, I can't say I did it, but I'm ready to take the punishment. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm
The food processing company didn’t contest liability. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
At least Milgram Wasn't Doing It For Profit From the hyper-civilized French comes a new game show: Game show contestants turn torturers in a new psychological experiment for French television, zapping a man with electricity until he cries for mercy — then zapping him again until he seems to drop dead. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:01 am
The examining division refused the invention as the "straightforward implementation of a known non-technical method on top of known hardware" (see page 7, esp. paragraphs 3 and 7), using the so-called "COMVIK approach" (based inter alia on T 641/00) for the examination of inventions comprising technical and non-technical features.1.1 The appellant argued that the examining division did not correctly assess inventive step, because it(a) "mixe[d] up absolute and… [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
T 2526/11, Reasons, point 2.2).4. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
In T 263/05 (OJ 2008, 329, see headnote, point IV) the board held "that the minutes of oral proceedings before the boards of appeal should record the requests of the parties on which a decision of the board is required", such as the form in which the proprietor seeks maintenance of the patent.The respondent's "request that a further request may be filed" at a later stage of the oral proceedings does not fulfil the requirements as set out by the cited case law of the… [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
T 2526/11, Reasons, point 2.2).4. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 1:25 pm
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:51 am
Didn't think so. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 9:51 pm
When his mug shot was viewed at the jail it was apparently easy to make a positive identification because the Wal-Mart loss prevention officer noticed that the man was wearing the same Dale Earnhart t-shirt that he wore when he was last arrested for stealing from the Wal-Mart store. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:56 am
Even though we like to think of ourselves as well-rounded, rational beings we can't help but to have an impression based rather quickly upon viewing a profile picture. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
The upper limit of the carbohydrate amount is thus ambiguous.Although the board accepts that, depending on the circumstances, an ambiguity (or lack of clarity) may lead to an insufficiency objection, it should be borne in mind that, as pointed out in T 608/07 [2.5.2], for an insufficiency objection, it is not enough to show that an ambiguity exists. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus, the question to be decided on this appeal is whether this refusal is an appropriate exercise of the discretion given to the ED under R 137(3). [3] Guidance on the principles to be applied can be derived from the Enlarged Board of Appeal decision G 7/93, as summarised in decision T 1064/04: (a) Until the issue of a decision to grant the patent, the ED has a discretion under Rule 137(3) EPC whether or not to allow the amendment of the application at a late stage (G 7/93 [2.1]). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
”The Board won’t have it that way:*** Translation of the German original ***[7] The refusal articulates the reasons for the discretionary decision of the ED not to admit auxiliary requests 1 to 6 as follows […]:There are unjustifiably many auxiliary requests and those requests do not converge towards patentable subject-matter.Former objections appear not to have been overcome.[7.1] According to its wording, point (a) presents the number of auxiliary requests and their… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
It therefore refused the application.In its written decision, the ED mentioned that“[t]he submissions filed by hand (thus not via the official fax number) with letter dated 09.05.2007 reached the ED four days after the OPs. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
Thus, contrary to the OD’s view, the board holds that, under the circumstances of the present case, post-published evidence may be considered (see decision T 1262/04). [28] Documents D43 and D32 describe the efficient transformation of primary human amniocytes by transfection with adenoviral E1 sequences. [read post]
