Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 1881 - 1900 of 9,052
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 am by azatty
And it makes you wonder if you are getting a full and complete examination of the issues underlying a Supreme Court docket. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:36 am by Zachary Hoying
The Nebraska Accountability and Disclosure Commission voted unanimously in August to stop enforcement of the 1992 law aimed at leveling the playing field in state political races following a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the state of Arizona where a similar law was deemed unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court today shot down an absolutely ridiculous Arizona law made voters provide proof they were U.S. citizens when the vote. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:40 am
There is some of the coolest stuff about how to do things in bankruptcy cases listed on the website of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:28 am by Immigration Prof
With President Trump scheduled to nominate a Supreme Court Justice later today, the high Court is on the minds of many. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:10 pm by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
Though this letter was not attached as an exhibit to the Supreme Court briefings, and had only been referenced in a single footnote in a motion submitted to Judge Vinson in district court in Florida, Paul Clement mentioned it at just the right moment during oral argument. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:31 am by David Brown
The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle discusses Monday's Supreme Court arguments in the Arizona campaign finance case. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:25 pm by lawmrh
Under Arizona Supreme Court Rule 32(d) and (l) and the Court’s administrative authority, costs and expenses are imposed in lawyer disciplinary proceedings. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:19 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
” The Howes lost a bid last month at the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh to stop them being sent to Arizona to face trial, but the same court last week gave them leave to go to the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 3:30 am by Hanlon Law, PA
Arizona, the United States Supreme Court interpreted the Fifth Amendment to require that a criminal suspect be verbally advised of their right to remain silent and to be represented by an attorney prior to being questioned by the police. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:23 am by Marcia Coyle
The rationale underlying the Justices' rulings in many of the election emergency applications is a 2006 Supreme Court decision stemming from an Arizona challenge—Purcell v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:58 am by johntfloyd
Arizona—the 1966 Supreme Court that established the following prophylactic rules for warning criminal suspects taken into police custody: 1) right to remain silent, 2) anything a suspect says can be used against him in a court of law, 3) suspect has right to have an attorney present during police questioning, and 4) if the suspect cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to him prior to police questioning. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 3:55 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
In a recent case decided by the Arizona Supreme Court, the defendant was charged with Marijuana transportation, and challenged the charges using Arizona’s Dress defense. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 3:55 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
In a recent case decided by the Arizona Supreme Court, the defendant was charged with Marijuana transportation, and challenged the charges using Arizona’s Dress defense. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
”   The state of Arizona contended in its appeal that the Arizona Supreme Court had undercut the Supreme Court’s 1981 decision in New York v. [read post]