Search for: "BULL V US" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
 Desporte v Bull [2021] EWHC 2370 (QB) (25 August 2021) Julian Knowles J made an extended civil restraint order following privacy and libel actions. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Julian Knowles J will hear the trial in the defamation case of Bull v Desporte. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
 ArtsTechnica told us in Ma [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
 A couple of weeks ago, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting in theHigh Court) handed down his decision in Glaxo v Sandoz [2016] EWHC 1537 in which he was asked by Sandoz to determine, on a summary judgment application, whether Glaxo's EU Trade Mark No 3890126 was invalid. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:50 am by Susan Brenner
From her mother's abuse she's mentally and physically abused her,/ And I'm getting tired of this bull-. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard  22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack, heard 16 and 18 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Desporte v Bull, heard 9 February 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Ansari v… [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 5:31 am by Josh Blackman
Here Garland picked a pit bull to investigate Trump (Smith), and a poodle to investigate Biden (Robert Hur). [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am by MOTP
" The trial court awarded the following damages: Actual damages: $881,918.28 Contractual pre-judgment interest: $375,021.20 Attorney's fees (trial): $110,000.00 Attorney's fees (appellate): $70,000.00 Total: $1,436,939.48 The trial court further found that appellee was entitled to recover from appellants post-judgment interest accruing at 5% simple interest and all costs of court. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Bell Canada, 2017 FC 6 https://t.co/Z80SOcWu44 -> Big win for Bell in major patent case, Mediatube Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Media and rights groups said authorities were using the law to crackdown on a vocal critic. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
In what follows, the Board examines auxiliary request IV.Claim 1 of this request read (the difference with respect to the main request is underlined):Dental composition comprising: (1) at least one crosslinkable and/or polymerizable silicone oligomer or polymer which is liquid at room temperature or which is heat-meltable at a temperature of less than 100°C, and which comprises: at least one unit of formula (FS): in which: a = 0,1 or 2, R0, identical or different, represents an… [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:12 am by war
Parkdale v Puxu was distinguished on its facts at 254 – 257. [read post]