Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 10,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am
This deceit is well outside ordinary bounds of zealous advocacy. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
” Finally, under Article VI, cl. 2, “[t]his Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:55 am
The Supreme Court will consider whether R (Draga) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 842 was correctly decided and whether the Court of Appeal in this case was, in fact, bound for the reasons it gave to follow Draga. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 11:01 am
The court refused to follow the DLSE opinion letter relied upon in Cicairos, and stated: In the absence of controlling California Supreme Court precedent, the court is Erie-bound to apply the law as it believes that court would do under the circumstances. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:58 am
The trial judge held that he was bound by the Court of Appeal decisions in Ul-Haq v Shah (2009) and Widlake v BAA Limited (2009). [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
Feeling themselves bound by the privilege, the lawyers said nothing while Alton Logan was tried, convicted, and sentenced to life for the killing. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 11:20 am
Do whatever he says 'cause he'll kill you.' R.T. testified that defendant bound her with a telephone cord and appeared to enjoy brutalizing her. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:41 pm
One of these cases was U.S. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:15 pm
Pennsylvania state courts continue using the old hyper-strict liability form of product liability in accordance with older state supreme court precedents, while federal courts, bound by Berrier's prediction apply the Third Restatement.Or does it? [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
Yesterday, the Sixth Circuit granted en banc review in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:36 am
So, of course, I had to look up the case, which is Nix v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm
Since the standard of review was "abuse of discretion," the justices felt compelled to defer to the trial judge's ruling, which relied on a 1972 Supreme Court precedent, Neil v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 7:23 pm
In Kondrat'Yev v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:55 pm
The New York Court of Appeals has ruled in the case of Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:51 am
Sooner or later, an intelligent, articulate legal scholar was bound to apply legitimate intellectual rigor and research to this blog’s musings. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:51 am
Sooner or later, an intelligent, articulate legal scholar was bound to apply legitimate intellectual rigor and research to this blog’s musings. [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 5:11 am
When excerpting Evenwel v. [read post]
