Search for: "CASH v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2010, 6:52 am
The lawsuit, captioned Gregorio de la Rosa, Sr., et al., v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
The Herald endorsed Regalado as did the United Teachers of Dade, the teachers' union. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:23 am
It covers each of the fifty states of the United States, the District of Columbia, the 12 federal Circuit Courts of Appeal and the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:02 pm
United States, essentially ruling that the US Department of Commerce could not concurrently apply countervailing duties (CVDs) and antidumping (AD) duties to imports from China, as long as China continues to be designated a "non-market economy" under the US antidumping law. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Kids for Cash Mark A. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:57 am
That United States District Court order, however, was vacated by a later order which directly contradicts Taylor's arguments on appeal. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
BEACON ASSOCIATES LLC I, 09 Civ. 6910 (AJP) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:38 am
United States (discussed here), the Supremes voted to let the requirement stand, at least for the time being. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:45 pm
” However, the United States Supreme Court upheld in its 1992 ruling on Quill Corp v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am
Since immigrating to the United States in 1991, Plaintiff has sued over twenty business entities for alleged accessibility violations, and, in all (but one) of those cases, he never returned to the establishment he sued after settling the case and obtaining a cash payment. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
(Michael Geist) United States US General Motorola and Huawei lawsuit re trade secret theft (Tangible IP) US Patents Is it ‘spare time’ if your employer owns your work? [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:09 am
Since immigrating to the United States in 1991, Plaintiff has sued over twenty business entities for alleged accessibility violations, and, in all (but one) of those cases, he never returned to the establishment he sued after settling the case and obtaining a cash payment. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 7:18 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
Two years ago, in Littman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:10 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:10 am
” §2.8 of the Retirement and Social Security Law defines the term “employer” as “The state, a participating employer, and any other unit of government or organization obligated or agreeing, under this article, to make contributions to the retirement system on behalf of its employees. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
Inasmuch as plaintiffs elected to accept the settlement without asserting their current claim that they were entitled to an additional amount representing the architectural and engineering fees, the settlement gave rise to an accord and satisfaction (see Gimper, Inc. v Giacchetta, 221 AD2d 682, 684 [1995]; Hemingway v State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
