Search for: "Corporations A, B, and C"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 7,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Birnie v HMA, Hodgson v HMA, Jude v HMA, McGowan v B, heard 11-12 Oct 2011. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical… [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd, heard 2-3… [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14… [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22… [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:35 am
§ 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c), 17 C.F.R. 240.l0b-5(a) and (c), where Respondents engaged in transactions with a public corporation with no legitimate business or economic purpose except to inflate artificially the public corporation's financial statements, but where Respondents themselves made no public statements concerning those transactions. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:41 am
That subsection states that an employment service-provider (A) must not, in relation to the provision of an employment service, discriminate against a person (B) (a) as to the terms on which A provides the service to B; (b) by not providing the service to B; (c) by terminating the provision of the service to B; or (d) by subjecting B to any other detriment. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
Copper Mesa Mining Corporation, 2010 ONSC 2421. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:01 am
There is, for example, no section 751 equivalent for C corporations, aside from a few narrow situations. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:11 pm
Section 28.2801-3(c)(4). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 8:24 am
It aims to illuminate certain effects of the adoption of CTB (and perhaps later section 954(c)(6)) in the international realm. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:16 am
§ 1391(c)(3) allows the lawsuit in N.J. against the foreign corporation: (3) a defendant not resident in the United States may be sued in any judicial district. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm
(c) Refrain from demanding cross-licenses when licensing such SEPs except for any patents that the licensees have in the same industry. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:56 pm
C. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:36 am
Coverage B and C essentially operate as balance sheet protection for the company. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
In particular, the general counsel and the board secretary ought to undertake, in partnership with the chief compliance officer, a key role in aligning corporate governance to the sustainable paradigm, including (a) ensuring that relevant stakeholders engaged in a healthy dialogue[15], (b) guiding the board of directors to effectively govern strategic ESG considerations, enabling informed decision-making, (c) advising the board to navigate fiduciary duties in respec [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:44 pm
Corporations Act ASIC regards gift cards potentially as “financial products” but has given relief (under RG 185 and CO/05-738) for gift vouchers and cards from the financial services licensing, conduct and disclosure obligations of the Corporations Act (together with the hawking prohibition). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:41 am
Mailed: September-October Issue of "The Corporate Counsel" We have mailed the September-October Issue of The Corporate Counsel, and it includes pieces on: - Regulation D Reimagined: Grappling with the New Rule 506 Bad Actor Disqualification Provisions - Form of Rule 506 Disqualification Event Questionnaire - Concurrent Rule 506(c) Offerings and Rule 506(b) Offerings--Integration Issues - Impact of FINRA Rules on Use of General Solicitation - More on… [read post]
8 May 2011, 1:28 pm
The Court of Appeal decided that: (a) neither Mr Shafron nor Mr Morley should be relieved from liability for their contraventions; (b) Mr Shafron should remain disqualified from managing corporations for 7 years, and in place of the judge’s order Mr Morley should be disqualified from managing corporations for 2 years from 27 August 2009; (c) in place of the judge’s orders, Mr Shafron should be ordered to pay a pecuniary penalty of $50,000 and Mr… [read post]
