Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 1881 - 1900 of 14,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
An example is the recent Colorado appeals court in Craig v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:57 am
The   National Intellectual Property Office, Hungary("the Office")  communicated to  Incyte the grant of the  SPC on  7 October 2014,  with  a notice  that an appeal to the administrative decision could be filed to the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest High Court, Hungary)  within 30 days of the communication of the decision. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:39 pm
The Bush Administration, expressing fear that a lower court ruling on the constitutional rights of members of Congress will hamper probes of corruption and criminal conduct by lawmakers, has asked the Supreme Court to limit the scope of the Constitution’s “Speech of Debate Clause. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:35 am
Hearsay evidence may be the basis for an administrative disciplinary determinationMatter of Hughes v New York State Unified Ct. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
The court held unanimously in Taggart v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 2:55 pm
The trial court held that the City of Barstow had to reconsider its decision, but the Court of Appeal reverses, holding that Mr. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 1:22 am by Jon Gelman
Today's post is shared from Judge David Langham and I would encourage to read his blog at: http://flojcc.blogspot.com/ David Langham is the Deputy Chief Judge of Compensation Claims for the Florida Office of Judges of Compensation Claims and Division of Administrative Hearings. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:15 pm by Gene Quinn
In early August, he released the first draft of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2022, which if enacted would abrogate the Supreme Court’s decisions in Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:15 pm by Gene Quinn
In early August, he released the first draft of the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2022, which if enacted would abrogate the Supreme Court’s decisions in Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]