Search for: "David Richard"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 7,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2017, 3:01 am
Allen-Bell, Washington Post] “Judge Halts Copyright Troll’s Lawsuit Against A Now-Deceased Elderly Man With Dementia And An IP Address” [Timothy Geigner] David Henderson reviews Richard Rothstein book on history of federal encouragement of housing segregation, The Color of Law [Cato Regulation magazine] Class action: sellers of cold-pressed juice should have disclosed that it was high-pressure-processed [Elaine Watson, Food Navigator USA] Tags:… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Pulgram, David L. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
David Friedman, and Dina Powell were consulting with policy experts about a new framework that could be ready early next year. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:58 am
” Additional coverage comes from Kimberly Robinson at Bloomberg BNA, David Porter and Jessica Gresko at the Associated Press, and Nina Totenberg at NPR, who notes that “[i]n the modern economic landscape, there is a growing tolerance for sports betting. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Yoshihide Soeya, Thomas Wright, Chikako Ueki, Tarun Chhabra and Richard Bush will discuss. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Kettl of University of Maryland’s School of Public Policy; David E. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:17 am
Additional coverage comes from Richard Wolf for USA Today, who reports that “[i]n a case that could have broad implications for privacy rights in the digital age, justices on both sides of the ideological spectrum said rapid advances in technology make decades-old precedents inadequate. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 5:00 pm
" David G. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 7:31 am
And take into account the other examples we've seen lately of great men to whom the rules arguably do not apply: Roman Polanski (movie director might be allowed to rape), Harvard students (elite collegians might be allowed to stalk), Richard Prince (important artist might be allowed to display child pornography), Brian David Mitchell (man of God might be allowed to rape). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
” Additional coverage of the argument comes from Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Andrew Chung at Reuters, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, and David Savage at the Los Angeles Times, who notes that “[s]everal liberal justices said they were troubled about leaving internal whistleblowers unprotected, but none voiced support for allowing Somers to sue. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 5:46 pm
David G. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
” Additional coverage of Carpenter, which will be argued tomorrow, comes from Richard Wolf for USA Today and Mark Walsh for the ABA Journal. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
David Stone also underlined the need for harmonisation of the unfair competition regime across the EU. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:41 pm
Rietjens, Agnes van der Heide Death by equivocation: pp 47-64By David Albert Jones Palliative sedation: pp 65-85By Josep Porta-Sales Clinical aspects of palliative sedation pp 86-99By Nigel P. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
As Richard Primus recognizes in the most thoughtful critique of the Calabresi-Hirji paper, court-packing does not violate the text of the Constitution. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
” At Casetext, David Boyle discusses the reply brief filed by the cakeshop last week, arguing that “under Petitioners’ ‘compelled speech’ theory of the case, bakers could quite possibly discriminate against interracial marriages and refuse to sell them a wedding cake, legally. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 8:16 am
Discussing on this blog the Calabresi-Hirji proposal to expand the federal judiciary, both David Super and Jack Balkin assert, in Balkin's words, "As David Super has explained, the proposal won't survive the tests for reconciliation, and so it will need 60 votes in the Senate. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am
Richard Betts and Matthew Waxman outlined a proposal to constrain and safeguard the president’s authority to launch a first-use nuclear attack. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:00 am
"Richard Primus, also of this blog, has written a fascinating essay about the proposal on the Harvard Law Review's new blog. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
Scheiber, Richard D. [read post]
