Search for: "Doe, et al v. V of T, et al"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 3,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2017, 4:53 pm
We have not seen studies or significant public data on this question, though there will be useful information in the study just published by Urban, et al.[1] Based on our own experience and discussion with other practitioners, we believe that it is rare for users to file counter-notices. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:32 am
[1] National Small Business United et al v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 5:07 pm
Arpaio, et al. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm
City and County of San Francisco, et al. (1st Dist., Div. 3, 5/31/13) ____ Cal.App.4th ____, 2013 WL 3209381.) [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:27 am
The Epic Games v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 12:58 pm
The lawsuit, Adam X. et al. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:04 pm
Choplin et al., A Psychological Investigation of Consumer Vulnerability to Fraud: Legal and Policy Implications, 35 Law & Psych. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Circuit Offers Bad News, Good New on Net Neutrality: FCC Repeal Upheld, But States Can Fill the Gap (EFF) Mozilla v FCC EFF Amicus Brief (EFF) California's Net Neutrality Law: What Happened, What's Next (EFF) CA’s Net Neutrality Law Letters of Supporters (EFF) Broad Coalition Urges Court Not to Block California's Net Neutrality Law (EFF) California Net Neutrality Cases - American Cable Association, et al v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am
The Opponents had raised objections on the grounds of Articles 100(a) and (b) EPC.The evidence cited during the opposition procedure includesD1: WO 2007/087243 A2;D2: WO 2004/041982 A1;D3: EP 1 867 708 A1;D4: V. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
., Furby et al., 1989; Harris, Rice, & Quinsey, 1998; Polizzi, MacKenzie, & Hickman, 1999). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 9:50 pm
In today’s case, Michel v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
SMITH, ET AL. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Wright, et al (June 7, 2013)(unpublished) and Blake v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:12 pm
" Dean Rainey, et al v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
It does not explain why it believes that is the case. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:59 pm
” Although the procedural history of David et al. v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
Because PFGE testing soon proved to be such a powerful outbreak investigation tool, PulseNet, a national database of PFGE test results was created. - Bala Swaminathan, et al., PulseNet: The Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Bacterial Disease Surveillance, United States, 7 Emerging Infect. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:33 pm
The First Circuit affirmed, holding that Appellant did not meet his burden of proving that there was a reasonable probability that he would not have pleaded guilty had he known of Dookhan’s transgressions.Read More: Federal court says Annie Dookhan’s ‘skullduggery’ not enough to get convicted crack dealer a new trialKagan, et al. v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:52 am
Martin, et al. [read post]
