Search for: "Does 1-58" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm by Robichaud
Clear rules on how sentencing courts must approach these presumptions whether a 64(1) order is appropriate. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm by Stephen Page
If the applicant does not prove the case, no protection order is made.3. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
We conclude that it does not. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:10 pm by Steve Bainbridge
"[2] The reference to a "rational business purpose," properly understood, does not contemplate substantive review of the decision's merits. [read post]
  The hospital appealed a significant NLRB decision issued in February 2023, 372 NLRB No. 58, which held that broad non-disparagement and confidentiality clauses in severance agreements signed by employees covered by the NLRA violate Section 8(a)(1) of the Act. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 7:36 am by Eric Goldman
“U.S. emoji users agree that emoji usage at work boosts their creativity (58%). [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:57 pm by MacIsaac
 As previously discussed, a successful civil lawsuit for damages may not be worthwhile if the responsible defendant does not have the ability to pay. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 8:08 am by Bob Gardiner
  Section 134(3) and s. 132 (1) of the Condo Act each have been based upon the discretion of the judge or arbitrator to award costs, damages and other remedies in their discretion. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:21 pm by StephanieWestAllen
  The writer can ask far more pointed questions, like, “Does the word or phrase that I want the reader to emphasize most appear in a Stress position? [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:20 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Importantly, the court found that if the tribunal unreasonably delays the parties in pronouncing the award, two options were available to the parties: (1) approach the tribunal and pray for expediting the award, (2) if that is not successful, invoke Section 14. [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:18 am
Town of Bedford, 58 AD3d 225, 231 [2d Dept 2008], quoting Hochhauser v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:30 am by Sam Gustin
“My website does not even host any torrents or direct-link to them,” Waleed GadElKareem, who is based in Alexandria, Egypt told the New York Times by e-mail. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:16 pm
  And does anyone expect President Obama to veto any China currency bill that reaches his desk? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:32 pm by John Elwood
This statutory restriction does not bar behind the scenes advice to a client. 18 U.S.C. 207(c)(1), which imposes a one-year prohibition on communications by former senior Executive Branch officials to their former department when those communications are knowingly made with the intent to influence the department ‘in connection with any matter on which such persons seeks official action by any officer or employee of such department. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:39 am by Adam Wagner
After all, there really aren’t that many demoted tenancies in operation, as the Supreme Court noted at [58]. [read post]