Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2019, 8:25 am
”) Celestino v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:15 am
In Vinmar Overseas (Singapore) Pte Ltd v PTT International Trading Pte Ltd [2018] SGCA 65, proceedings were commenced in Singapore in respect of an alleged breach of a commercial sale contract containing an exclusive choice of English court agreement. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm
On 17 May 2019, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors ([2019] EWCA Civ 852). [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member States will… [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:34 pm
A firm’s Form CRS should be written in plain English; indeed, firms are instructed to avoid using legal jargon and highly technical terms. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 6:02 am
In August 2016, a number of health care organizations, along with five states, challenged the definition of “on the basis of sex” in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
The Oxford English Dictionary is even less helpful. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
The Joint Statement is reproduced in English and Chinese below. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
In State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:10 pm
Furthermore, the court held that Australian Leather’s reliance on the doctrine of foreign equivalents was misplaced, stating that the doctrine is generally used to analyze non-English terms used in the American marketplace, rather than English-to-English comparisons. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:59 am
Jurisdictional battles in IP were confined to memories of Actavis v Lilly and pan-European DNIs, not, what is essentially, the scope of a damages inquiry. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:38 am
The Midwestern agricultural states were hit particularly hard. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 12:26 pm
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
In Smith v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes reports on a recent English High Court case (Emson v Hozelock), in which Mr Justice Nugee, in a follow-up to the classic UK case Windsurfing, considered the issue of when a disclosure may be considered public. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:59 am
Some of America’s pre-constitutional colonies followed the practice to punish individuals loyal to the English crown, but those who wrote the Constitution in Philadelphia in 1787 were determined to forbid the practice and did so as part of Article I. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:10 am
State-sponsored hackers can give their countries a competitive advantage against the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:40 am
The following text is an inofficial English translation of the article ProtonMail bietet freiwillig Hand für Echtzeit-Überwachungen as published on 23 May 2019 in German. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:07 pm
In Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. [read post]
