Search for: "Edwards v. Means"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 1,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2008, 5:21 pm
“Through the trial the defendants demonstrated a failure to accept the claim construction governing this case. . . . they essentially urged the jury to adopt an interpretation of the patent claims developed by their experts instead of the construction mandated by the Federal Circuit,” wrote Judge Edward Harrington, ordering a $10 million penalty plus some attorneys fees against Medtronic, in Depuy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 12:55 am
One commenter to the DDB v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 4:15 am
The Irish caselaw on this point is an ex tempore decision, EMI v Eircom. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:49 am
Edwards - on whether the Sixth Amendment grants a defendant found competent to stand trial the right to represent himself in a criminal proceeding. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Implications for policy and practice are discussed.Sexual victimization has become one of the most publicized issues of our time (Edwards & Hensley, 2001). [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:01 pm
EDWARDS v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 7:53 am
Skolnick
What Does Free Movement Mean in Theory and Practice in an Enlarged EU? [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Moreover, an income withholding order is not to be utilized to deprive an obligor of his or her means of self-support. * * * Finally, the trial court's determination that Mark knew he was ordered to pay $266.00 weekly is contrary to the evidence of record. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
Case Name: West America Housing Corp. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
Case Name: West America Housing Corp. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 9:32 am
Equal rights means ... well ... equal rights. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:20 am
Tabbaa v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:05 am
Bush and Al Odah v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:31 am
Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), the case that essentially applied Baker v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:27 pm
In Melzer v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:16 pm
John Edwards (North Carolina) dodged the human-rights-versus-national-security dichotomy posited, and so in turning to Sen. [read post]
