Search for: "English v. English"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
Audry Linton v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:05 am
Ashe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:44 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:41 am
There was no rule of construction and no rule of law which stated that a reinsurer must respond to every valid claim under the insurance irrespective of the terms of the reinsurance.The most important aspect to the decision was the way in which the Lords distinguished the present case from the decision of the House of Lords in Vesta v Butcher [1989] AC 852. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Roth at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP in Birmingham, Alabama: This is a synopsis of the US v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 5:03 am
In the case Christman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
While that public included professionals and registration was sought for financial services, the relevant public's attention was low when slogans are concerned.Examining the Board of Appeal’s assessment of the mark’s meaning, the Court pointed out that ‘INVESTING FOR A NEW WORLD’ is a combination of common English words which respect the rules of English grammar. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Mr Bleuse, a German national who worked for a UK company throughout Europe (but not in the UK) under an English law contract, was unable to bring claims for unfair dismissal or unlawful deduction of wages because he could not satisfy the tests set out in Lawson v Serco – that is to say his employment did not have sufficient connection to the UK; his English law contract was not enough for these purposes. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
"There were lots of things that might have shaken Michael Behnke's confidence in the lawyers at English & Gloven here in San Diego. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:50 am
It can't be a very important case, since the Advocate General's Opinion this morning has only been published in 11 of the European Union's official languages, and certainly not in English, but Case C? [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week, the most-consulted three English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:55 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:00 am
Holly’s talk focused on Mawhinney v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:47 am
Oklahoma City University’s Michael O’Shea explains the history and multiple meanings of United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:45 pm
It has long been a principle of English law that someone should not have the benefit of unjust enrichment. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:46 am
In Re Digital Satellites Warranty Cover Limited & ors [2011] EWHC 122 (Ch) the English Companies Court considered three “public interest” petitions brought by the UK Financial Services Authority (the FSA) for the winding-up of two companies and a partnership (the Respondents). [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:03 pm
" Revson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
Each Wednesday we tell you which three English-language cases and which French-language case have been the most viewed* on CanLII and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. [read post]
