Search for: "Express Services Inc" Results 1881 - 1900 of 6,154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2018, 2:31 pm by Greg Jordan
Fields began by pointing out that merely rendering legal services to a corporation does not create an attorney-client relationship between the attorney and the corporation’s officers, directors or shareholders. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:23 pm by Limore Torbati
Google, Inc., 50 Cal.4th 512 (2010): The Legislature affirmed reliance on the “stray remarks” standard articulated in Reid. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:25 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)), the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
BackgroundCash Biz, LP is a registered Texas credit services organization that assists customers in obtaining short-term loans. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:58 am
Following the US Supreme Court judgment in Feist Publications Inc v Rural Telephone Services (499 US 340 (1991)) (Feist) the term “original” entails two components: independent creation and sufficient creativity. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 2:09 pm
(…) Records subpoenaed from Comcast identified (…) Gonzales as the subscriber of the internet service associated with the IP address. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
The New “Right to be Forgotten” and Online Expression in the Jurisprudence of the Intern… https://t.co/ZxsOh5Zz21 2018-09-10 ASBCA Enforces Contractor’s Commercial Software License Against Government | JD Supra https://t.co/KUG0lyXwFE 2018-09-10 Omaha jury reaches $53.6M verdict in battle between data companies https://t.co/UYywmCmIMd 2018-09-10 Supreme court to release decision in Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:24 pm by Barry Sookman
The issue was resolved earlier today by the Supreme Court in Rogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]