Search for: "FOX v. STATE" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2014, 4:27 pm by Aaron Weems
Attorneys across the state breathed a sigh of relief; they could actually email their experts again. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:28 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision May 14, 2014Justice Fox delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:04 am by Scott Plamondon
  On April 22, 2014 the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of American Broadcasting Company (“ABC”) v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
In Glatt v Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc, for example, Judge Pauley certified a class of interns based on testimony that the company’s various departments requested interns according to their productivity needs, and an internal memo stating that the unpaid intern program “more than doubled” due to the defendant’s elimination of paid internships and the scaling back of overtime pay and temp workers. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:01 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On April 28th 2014 the Appellate Division issued an unpublished decision in the post-judgment case of Fox v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:37 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: GILBERT ORTIZ, JR. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Princeton, NJ lawyer Elizabeth Litten of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog, HIPAA, HITECH & HIT State of Minnesota’s DWI Test Refusal Law In Flux – Roseville, MN attorney Daniel Koewler of Ramsay Law Firm on the firm’s blog, Minnesota DWI Defense Rebranding in Professional Sports: The Good, Sporting Kansas City – Nashville lawyer Kevin Hartley of Stites & Harbison on the firm’s blog, Trademarkology… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:41 pm by Orly Lobel
In two early decisions, Fortnightly Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:29 pm by Jason Rantanen
(Also, this morning the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Apple v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:36 am by Eliana Baer
Nonetheless, that type of common sense analysis typically gets lost in the semantics of Lepis v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:42 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Regular readers of this blog know that we were the winning attorneys in the Appellate Division in the landmark palimony case, Maeker v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:22 am by WSLL
Reversed and remanded.Case Name: GREGORY MATTHEWS v. [read post]