Search for: "Fee v. United States" Results 1881 - 1900 of 6,846
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2008, 5:05 am
District Court for the Western District, styled United States of America v Paul Hollern, Case No. 3:06CR-82-S. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Michelle Ghetti
This would be devastating to gun-related commerce throughout the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Court denied review in a major sequel to its campaign finance ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices will consider the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:50 am by Ben Vernia
The Eleventh Circuit quickly disposed of Campbell’s argument that the award was not taxable because, as “assignee of the United States’ claim against Lockheed, he stands in the shoes of the government in receipt of a nontaxable recovery. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 pm
(Complaint)https://www.law360.com/articles/1537269/emirates-airline-unit-accused-of-illegal-biweekly-pay (subscription required) [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 8:15 am
The lawsuit, which has been filed in the United States District Court for the Norther District of Indiana, alleges that Attorney Meyer filed a debt collection lawsuit on behalf of his client, Unity Surgical Center, LLC, against the wife of man who received medical treatment at the Unity Surgical Center. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by Amul Kalia
If the user decides to join, the video will stay up in the United States and, if the rightsholder sues, YouTube will provide assistance of up to $1 million dollars in legal fees. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:45 am by Beth Graham
  In response, Waterstone Mortgage filed a motion to stay “until the United States Supreme Court reaches a decision in the consolidated cases of Ernst & Young, LLP v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am by James Coppess
State Bar of California by relying entirely on Abood in setting the constitutional limits on mandatory bar fees. [read post]
29 May 2016, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
  Moreover, it argues, U.S. courts have jurisdiction under the FSIA’s “commercial activity” exception, which (among other things) allows lawsuits based on conduct that takes place outside the United States “in connection with a commercial activity of a foreign state” and causes a direct effect in the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:03 am by Marty Lederman
The Court will not reach the merits of the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]