Search for: "Good v. State"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 45,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am
This is supposed to be one of the things they are really good at doing. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 4:46 pm
The Supreme Court recognized as much in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
State v. Outing and Change Blindness: Will the Connecticut Supreme Court Respect Empirical Evidence?
29 Jul 2009, 10:01 pm
Perhaps there are good reasons - although I haven't heard any. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:42 am
State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:12 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
I use PowerPoints in my classes, and I’ve been searching fruitlessly for good visuals for the Katz v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:44 am
It also violates the separation of powers by the required deference in federal habeas to wrongly decided state decisions.U.S. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:57 pm
Rooker-Feldman only applies when you're a "state court loser," which is why it doesn't apply in this case.The case is Green v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:58 pm
In Dickerson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:21 am
This is Part V, the final installment, in a series discussing the holding in Reliable Fire Equipment v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Miller v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:00 pm
Some states have even begun to tax digital goods as well. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
” Since those particulars were not supplied, the AD2 didn't think the requested relief should have been entertained.Sorry, but that’s about all we’re able to disclose.# # #DECISIONMuchnik v Mendez Trucking, Inc. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
No, says Farm & Ranch Investors, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
(Or at least the best one that doesn't take up 20,000+ words.)The California Supreme Court has to wade into all this in deciding this opinion, which holds that, in this particular context, the required mental state of "knowing" is belied by a good faith belief in the legality of one's conduct. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:00 am
The post Case Review – Bird Construction Group v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 9:19 pm
In United States v. 191.07 Acres of Land (Martinek) (No. 04-35131, Apr. 4, 2007), the Ninth Circuit set out a good definition of "inverse condemnation" in the context of when a property owner has a right to a jury trial for federal takings. [read post]
