Search for: "Grand Jury Proceedings, in Re*"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2017, 5:41 am
An accuser may testify before the grand jury when the prosecution seeks an indictment. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:46 am
There was a grand jury investigation of the police here, and the case was no-billed. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
As the court recognized in Vance, Trump’s argument for immunity was deeply ahistorical — presidents have been investigated and made to give evidence many times before (and here, we should remember, the New York grand jury subpoenaed a third party, not the president). [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
In a press release, Vance hailed the decision as a victory for the “founding principle that no one—not even a President—is above the law” and vowed to be “guided as always by the grand jury’s solemn obligation to follow the law and the facts, wherever they may lead. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:46 am
There was a grand jury investigation of the police here, and the case was no-billed. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am
The Charlotte Observer reported that in April of this year a Forsyth County grand jury returned a true bill of indictment against the nurse but declined to indict the former detention officers. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
Grand Committee, House of Lords. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
Many criminal convictions result in a finding of a lack of good moral character and/or placement in removal proceedings. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
Vance, the court held that President Trump was obliged to comply with a subpoena for personal documents issued by a state grand jury. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
The Department obtained a grand-jury subpoena directed to Trump’s custodian of records and requested all documents or writings in Trump’s custody or control bearing classification markings.In response to the subpoena, Trump’s representatives produced an envelope containing thirty-eight such documents. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:50 am
Former President Trump’s standing in the Republican party has shown no sign of waning, even after the latest indictment by a federal grand jury. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 2:31 am
It was held that they could not be tendered as exhibits before the jury but could be marked for identification and copies of them may be provided to the jury as aids to memory, accompanied by explanations and directions to the effect that the transcripts so provided, do not constitute evidence or exhibits in the proceedings. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
Some judges insisted that we show up at the first hearing with a shopping cart full of grand jury transcripts, FBI reports (called 302's), etc. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:40 am
A federal prosecutor focused on protecting the integrity of the judicial process, and armed with persuasive evidence of intentional leaking, will almost certainly be able to present charges to a federal grand jury. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
As the majority acknowledges, the two-year limitations period apparently will soon expire, and if we enjoin the grand jury proceedings, the State will forever lose its opportunity to enforce the law. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Attorney thus "is not required to refer a contempt citation in these circumstances to a grand jury or otherwise to prosecute an Executive Branch official who is carrying out the President's [executive privilege] instruction. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:10 am
Section 542.296 contains no mechanism for challenging the lawfulness of a search and seizure and requesting the return of seized property outside of filing a motion to suppress in the pending criminal proceeding. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:35 pm
Q14: What is the role of a grand jury in felony cases? [read post]
27 May 2019, 5:53 pm
It was easy to sit in court and watch them work, evaluate how they interacted with a judge and jury, and most importantly, follow their thought process on prosecuting individuals. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Eff, No. 07-40338 A conviction on three counts of arson is affirmed where, when considering the appropriate reach of the expert testimony and other evidence in the light most favorable to defendant, the evidence was insufficient to warrant a jury instruction on insanity. [read post]
