Search for: "Grand Jury Proceedings, in Re*" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
The commentary to MCR 2.516 states: “former GCR 1963, 516.5, regarding condemnation proceedings, is omitted. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am by Andrew Frisch
Because at-issue waiver is to be “decided by the courts on a case-by-case basis, and depends primarily on the specific context in which the privilege is asserted,” In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 219 F.3d at 183, the Court will examine the specific factual context of this case. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
A jury acquitted Sweeney of Wythe’s murder in part because of a botched investigation and the lack of “eligible” witnesses. [read post]
11 May 2008, 5:00 am
The reason duplicity and multiplicity are a problem is that both undermine the fairness of the proceeding. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:36 am
HIV/HCV/AIDS review Last Act: 02/27/07 reported referred to ways and means LAW / CORRECTNSA4180 Aubry (MS) -- Provides inmates and parolees with access to pre-sentence reports BLURB : Cor. inmates and paro acc. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 5:51 am by Tom Joscelyn
As one of the principal authors of the Select Committee’s final report, I read the indictment with an eye to what new evidence Smith and his team had unearthed. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Notwithstanding a complainant's election to proceed in family court, the criminal court shall not be divested of jurisdiction to hear a family offense proceeding pursuant to this section. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:17 pm by Michael Lowe
  The alleged lie forming the basis of the perjury charge may have been told before a grand jury; in a separate criminal proceeding; or any type of civil matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 6:43 am
Given theimportance that expert testimony can assume, the jury should be aware ofdocuments and tangible things provided to the expert that might have influencedthe expert's opinion. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But when the cops in Manuel’s case intentionally deprived him of liberty by manipulating the grand jury proceedings, they committed a constitutional violation at that time. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
The County's District Attorney had presented charges that the four had committed "official misconduct" to a grand jury. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 7:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Separately, as the government notes, there is a First Amendment right of access to certain criminal proceedings. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, the Amended Complaint, like its predecessor, fails to account for the Supreme Court's requirement that to obstruct justice there must be a nexus to a judicial or grand jury proceeding. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
With the short SOLs, we know less about clergy sex abuse in New York City than anywhere else in the country.Third, neither New York City District Attorneys nor the New York Attorney General’s office ever took the courageous step of calling a grand jury to investigate the many clerical sexual predators in their midst, which aided and abetted the secrecy that has enrobed the New York City Archdiocese.Cardinal Dolan arrived in New York, and picked up where his predecessor,… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 5:51 am by Albert W. Alschuler
” For example, when President Nixon unsuccessfully resisted delivering White House tapes to a grand jury, he did not argue that he was exempt from the statute authorizing grand jury subpoenas and criminal enforcement of that statute because that statute didn’t specifically mention the president. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by Ted Folkman
Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972), to the Scooter Libby/Judith Miller case, are quite hostile to the idea of a privilege in the face of a grand jury subpoena, and as I noted in my response to Chris Bray’s thoughtful post, the policy of the common law is hostile to such a privilege: For more than three centuries it has now been recognized as a fundamental maxim that the public (in the words sanctioned by Lord Hardwicke) has a right to every man’s evidence. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Maryland is a back end test about where a Court is able to assess with 20/20 hindsight about what is favorable to a defendant and whether or not it had an effect on the proceedings. [read post]