Search for: "House v. House"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 41,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 2:11 pm
Would Glossip v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Austin v Southwark LBC is being heard in the Supreme Court tomorrow - Wednesday 21 April - and Thursday, for starters), I thought we might take a look at the main parties' manifesto commitments on housing and housing law related issues. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Austin v Southwark LBC is being heard in the Supreme Court tomorrow - Wednesday 21 April - and Thursday, for starters), I thought we might take a look at the main parties' manifesto commitments on housing and housing law related issues. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 3:00 pm
The petitions of the day are: Findlay v. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
Cuomo v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 8:21 am
Gallagher (Valuation Officer) v Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints House of Lords “A Mormon Temple, which was open only to Mormons in good standing, was not a place of public religious worship within the meaning of paragraph 11(1)(a) of Schedule 5 to the Local Government Finance Act 1988 and was thus not exempt from the rating list. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:26 am
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 138 “The phrase ‘a self-contained part of a building’ in ss 3 and 4 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 did not, either expressly or by implication, require that a self-contained part of a building should be indivisible into smaller such parts. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 2:17 am
Permit required for intermediate treatment United Utilities Water plc v Environment Agency for England and Wales House of Lords “The requirement for a permit in order to operate waste water plants, where the treatment resulted in nonhazardous waste being discarded, applied to installations where intermediate treatment took place prior to transportation to another site for final treatment and disposal. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:31 am
Van Colle and Another v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary House of Lords “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the state's decision to call him as a witness. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 am
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 138 “The phrase ‘a self-contained part of a building’ in ss 3 and 4 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 did not, either expressly or by implication, require that a self-contained part of a building should be indivisible into smaller such parts. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 8:54 am
Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd and Another House of Lords “Where the claimant had entered into an oral agreement with defendants in connection with the redevelopment of their property, their unconscionable behaviour in withdrawing from the agreement once planning permission for the redevelopment had been obtained did not result in a proprietary estoppel or a constructive trust in favour of the claimant. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:05 am
41–60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd v Craftrule Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 185; [2011] WLR (D) 62 “The meaning of the words ‘a self-contained … part of a building’ in section 3 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 was clear and there was nothing in the section to suggest that the right to enfranchisement attached only to the smallest possible self-contained part of a building. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:53 am
” By way of example, in the 2005 case of Malewicz v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:18 am
Watford Community Housing Trust v Personal Representatives of Elizabeth Chalmers, Watford County Court 14 January 2011 This was a possession claim under Ground 9 Schedule 2 Housing Act 1988 - Suitable Alternative Accommodation. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:18 am
Watford Community Housing Trust v Personal Representatives of Elizabeth Chalmers, Watford County Court 14 January 2011 This was a possession claim under Ground 9 Schedule 2 Housing Act 1988 - Suitable Alternative Accommodation. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:11 am
The judgment in London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (Aka, Powell, Hall and Frisby) is out. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:11 am
The judgment in London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (Aka, Powell, Hall and Frisby) is out. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:16 pm
Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 595 (1991), and M/S Bremen v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
Part IV of this series on reducing e-discovery costs described how bringing e-discovery in-house can reduce costs. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument tomorrow, January 21st, in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
