Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF D. B., A CHILD"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 2,182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Most African slaves and their descendants were more interesting in fighting against European powers, rather than fighting for them. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:28 am
a considerably improved capacity in courts to solicit or provide high-quality assessmentsthat will assist them to make safe, timely and child-focused decisions, especially at theinterim stage; and?? [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:52 am
§§ 109(g), 362(d) and (e). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:14 pm
D’Allessandro served as Law Guardian appointed by the Court to represent the interest of the twins in this lawsuit. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 1:40 pm
You will want to consider all of the topics in A and B below, and you may need to consider the topics in C, D and E as well. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 1:40 pm
You will want to consider all of the topics in A and B below, and you may need to consider the topics in C, D and E as well. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 6:21 pm
places where the child or traveling parent can be reached; and d. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:34 am
Basically, FIN 46 said there are no orphans: every child has one and only one father. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:45 am
Las Vegas Police (D. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
§ 1158(a)(2)(D). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 5:30 am
Written by Craig D. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am
Capitalists@Work predictions in 2009 makes interesting reading. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:26 am
(d) If the relocating individual meets the burden of proof under subsection (c), the burden shifts to the nonrelocating parent to show that the proposed relocation is not in the best interest of the child. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:01 am
This situation encourages others to seek their own special interest provision. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:52 pm
I found this to be a very interesting article from Newsweek. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:29 pm
Class “B”- Eliminated by statute effective July 1, 1963. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
The Lebanon Family Division ruled that Muchmore had failed to meet his burden of proof with regard to each of the reasons for modification he cited, pursuant to 461-A:11; I(b), I(c), and I(d). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:18 am
I’d like to join them with this scholarship! [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm
P. 9.430(d). 5 Fla. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:56 am
Ultimately, the Court must approve the plan as being the the best interests of the child or children. [read post]
