Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 8,735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2020, 1:53 pm
” Although Meiklejohn wasn’t a lawyer, his theory struck a chord. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 12:05 pm
James W. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:08 am
This is a reminder that orthodoxy--no matter how appealing and necessary within a system (and some of us strongly believe that)--is an impediment to the rigorous study between normatively incompatible systems. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:09 pm
” The Supreme Court stated that “[w]hat matters, at bottom, is what an employee does,” and “educating young people in their faith, inculcating its teachings, and training them to live their faith are responsibilities that lie at the very core of the mission of a private religious school. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:46 am
What if race isn’t the center of universe? [read post]
Working with Tech from Home Efficiently, Ethically and Securely in the Legal Profession [Guest Post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:13 am
., John W. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:30 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International… [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
Because enough voters didn’t care or didn’t care enough, he was elected. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 3:33 am
Good lawyers don’t lie to themselves or their clients by pretending that the story that matters is the client’s. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:29 am
Whether you agree with them or not, and I often don’t, you have to admire the fact that the Court just plugs along and, when push comes to shove, reminds us why life tenure matters and why they aren’t worried about being invited to Linda Greenhouse’s dinner party. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
Newman, Peter W. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
” Barr said Durham was investigating questions that included: [W]hat was the predicate for it? [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am
Also at the NCSL Blog, Soronen writes that “[w]ithout explanation, without referring the matter to the entire U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:49 am
James W. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:45 am
When the matter finally came before the South Carolina Supreme Court, Justice John W. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:47 am
The Sullivan-Mestecky court also considered surcharge under Section 502(a)(3) and found that this was dependent upon the plaintiff’s allegation of fiduciary breach, specifically that Verizon failed to act with the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use as ERISA requires. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 2:29 pm
So, a notice under section 8 would fall under section 7 H(W)A. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 2:39 pm
It doesn't matter if other factors besides the plaintiff's sex contributed to the decision. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 7:45 am
In this 2017 piece (see also updated version here), I explained why it matters that the Declaration of Independence did not justify secession from the British Empire on the basis of ethnic nationalism, but rather based on universal principles of human rights, which the British government had violated: [W]e too often forget a crucial way in which the principles of the Declaration of Independence contrast with those of virtually all modern independence movements. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:07 pm
James W. [read post]
