Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 5,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2009, 2:14 pm
Federal law says they're illegal under a wide variety of settings. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:11 pm
Cal. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:03 am
Cal; Coleman to N.D. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:00 pm
(blogged here), the Cal. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:11 pm
Cal. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
.'Cause apparently we're far from perfect from screening out "upstanding" 25-year olds who want to marry a 14-year old girl he met when she was 10 from, say, a straight-up child molester.Like Mr. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm
But $3,500 or $4,500 a year for the whole marriage, even if (as here) they're married for 15+ years?! [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm
As Justice Bedsworth says, yes, offering him five years if he pleads guilty does make sure he goes to prison, and saves us a little bit of money in prosecution costs, but "[a]ny expense saved the state by his plea would likely be re-incurred with interest if he gets out in five years and there are still bus stops. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm
But one's willingness to fire up your car and suddenly pull away as the police approach might be even lower if, say, you're a young black man with dreadlocks in South LA. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:40 pm
You're qualified. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:01 pm
The mother instructed [Husband] to take over and stated ‘now you’re really going to die. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:51 pm
(With a trigger warning that they're distinctly sexual.) [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
"So unless you're sharing child pornography (or have it on your computer) that's totally unique and not seen by any officers before, it looks like it's probably going to have a "hash value" and be discovered.Not a risk I'd take -- at all -- even for things that aren't immoral, harmful and incredibly sleazy.The other fascinating thing about this opinion is how it begins. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:41 am
I'm so glad you‟re interested in talking more. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:49 pm
It's another to publish that opinion and to savage the person you're sanctioning.That's what the Court of Appeal does today.The target of the Court's ire is (inactive) attorney Robert Thomas Fair. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 3:46 pm
Apparently, even when they're used as intended, your neighbor can potentially sue you and win.Good to know. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:11 pm
The Labor Board officials file a demurrer that gets sustained, so they're out. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:21 pm
Even if we're fairly confident that he's totally unlikely to commit any similar offense in the future.So what sentence do you give him? [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 3:26 pm
The fact that you win on appeal and reverse an interim order (there, and MSJ) doesn't mean you're entitled to fees.So I'm fairly confident that the defendant is right. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:35 pm
I would have preferred that Justice Stratton not begin her dissent with the ostensible consequences of the majority opinion, both because I think they're unreal and because I fear that some future litigants (e.g., insurance companies) might use that analysis to their advantage in future litigation or settlements. [read post]
