Search for: "In Re Gray" Results 1881 - 1900 of 2,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm by Jackie McDermott
The first category is most likely to be upheld by the Court, with the second more of a gray area, and the third less likely. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
" Matter of S.G., W.G., Jr., Children in Need of Services; William Gray, Sr. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 7:01 am by Kristin Michelle Ekert
 What you find in Iraqi society, and many societies throughout the world, is that judges respect gray hair. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 11:14 pm
I didn't get to send any bad guys to the old gray-bar hotel, like I hoped. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:50 am by Roy Black
Always there echoes and re-echoes: Duty, Honor, Country. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:49 pm by jordan
Also, an attorney can advise on the best way to navigate any gray area or ambiguity in the wording, ensuring that you don’t inadvertently hurt your claim. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway Feast Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
In the final interview, on 8 April 1987, Gray made over two dozen allegations of police corruption, focusing on Ray Adams. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's Broadway Feast Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by INFORRM
The decisions of Gray and Lewison JJ were “at the very least persuasive” and “still good law” [48]. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP)   United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am by admin
Court documents refer to it as “that certain unnamed gray, two-story vessel approximately 57 feet in length. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: TTAB says STEAM N’ MASH merely descriptive of process potatoes: In re ProMark Brands Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:45 am by Adrian Lurssen
" Portfolio | RSS - Ropes & Gray"From start-ups to Fortune 500 global companies, Ropes & Gray represents finance, life sciences, manufacturing, electronics, technology, pharmaceutical, banking and consumer product leaders worldwide... [read post]