Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 1881 - 1900
of 13,823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 3:19 am
See, e.g., In re Bayer AG, 488 F.3d 960, 82 USPQ2d 1828, 1833 (Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
To hedge the risk that you’re buying a lemon, you make a lower offer. [read post]
19 May 2020, 6:41 am
They’re China-centric, to put it nicer. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 6:52 pm
[4] See e.g., C. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
See, e.g., In re JJMM International Corp., Case No. 11-76540-ast (Bankr. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:41 am
EXCERPT RE: LOCATIONS: We are designating 12 units as critical habitat for the Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep... [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:28 am
Pricing starts at $499.99 ($399.99 if you're upgrading) with volume discounts available. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:00 pm
And in some cases, we might even seek punitive damages to “punish” the defendant for wrongdoing e.g. in product liability claims. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:29 am
Today we have two cases that illustrate the maxim that if you have a beef with an airline, you're screwed, plain and simple, thanks to federal preemption. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:53 pm
See, e.g., In re Citibank, N.A., 225 USPQ 612 (TTAB 1985); In re Champion Int’l Corp., 220 USPQ 478 (TTAB 1982); In re Air Products, Inc., 124 USPQ 81 (TTAB 1960). [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
Raising procedural challenges -- e.g. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 11:57 am
See, e.g., In re RSI Sys., LLC, 88 USPQ2d 1445, 1448 (TTAB 2008); In re Melville Corp., 18 USPQ2d 1386, 1388 (TTAB 1991); In re Pollio Dairy Prods. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
E.g., Carlin v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
`Res gestae is a theory of relevance which recognizes that certain evidence is relevant because of its unique relationship to the charged crime. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 4:07 pm
 They're all pretty heavily regulated industries, and they also did better than the big banks. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 3:31 pm
And so, we’re now seeing serious discussion of new forms of regulation for that market. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 7:31 am
While her case is the most well known in recent memory, it was neither the first nor will it be the last.Even if you're young and healthy, remember that accidents happen. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:07 am
In re Gabriel Miller & Jason Miller, Serial No. 77855808 (November 3, 2011) [not precedential].As to the similarity of the marks at issue here, the Board found that this "critical" du Pont factor points to a finding of likely confusion. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:59 am
It seemed to me in reading this case that it also illustrated a few points relevant in Canada, including ensuring that advertising claims are both true and not misleading (e.g., through banner or headline claims that cannot stand on their own or may be contradicted by disclaimers), the importance of including any important conditions or limitations in clear language and in close proximity to primary claims (e.g., limitations on promotional giveaways or other offers), and following… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 10:13 pm
If you’re planning on getting married, having children, or preparing your Will, there will also be SIGNIFICANT legal implications on your medicine professional corporation – which I will be discussing next. [read post]
