Search for: "In v. United States" Results 1881 - 1900 of 102,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
United States Supreme Court Protects Aliens' Right to Judicial Review of Motions to Re-open. [read post]
26 May 2023, 9:02 am by Ron Coleman
I was going to do a post collecting all the briefs filed in the United States Supreme Court in Lee v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 10:00 pm
Software Eligibility in the United States Nowhere in the United States Patent Act (Title 35 of the United States Code) is software or computer programs specifically mentioned. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:19 am
Regina (BA)(Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The right of appeal against the refusal by the Home Office to revoke a deportation order was exercisable from within the United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (Al-Saadoon and Another) v Secretary of State for Defence Court of Appeal “Iraqi detainees held in a United Kingdom internment facility in Iraq on the authority of the local criminal court were not under the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:08 am
From the ABA Criminal Justice Section: http://www.abanet.org/crimjust United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Myriad Genetics, Inc., the United States asks the Supreme Court to affirm the judgment of the Federal Circuit that cDNA is patent-eligible and reverse the judgment of the appellate court that isolated but otherwise unmodified DNA is patent-eligible. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:55 am by traceydennis
Timbrell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 701; [2010] WLR (D) 155 The Gender Recognition Act 2004 did not have retrospective effect, and since the United Kingdom had failed to implement the relevant Community law Directive within the time permitted so far as concerned acquired gender and rights to pensions, an individual could invoke the Directive as its provisions were unconditional and precise. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:09 am by Marvin Schuldiner
On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court issued their opinion in United States v. [read post]