Search for: "JUDGE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The documents included two Extremism Analysis Unit Home Office reports and a Counter Terrorism Policing report. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am by Nancy Prager
Fair use, like obscenity, is something that judges in America seem to know when they see it. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:06 pm
Girl Scouts of the United States of America. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
The pioneers of the field and many who followed in their footsteps weren’t trying to fashion a body of law for a rapidly expanding administrative state by being exclusively self-referential—that is, by focusing only on our own idiosyncratic experiences and needs in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:12 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has said no to the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild’s (ACCG) request to challenge issues previously argued in the case of Ancient Coin Collectors Guild v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 10:39 am
At the outset, Judge Sam Sparks of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas reviewed the legislative history of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 and several of the cases upholding immunity of an interactive service provider under Section 230 for claims other than defamation. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 3:12 pm
A young lawyer named John Roberts spearheaded this effort, so it is no surprise that, as chief justice of the United States, he has helped enshrine this warped conception of the FAA into law. [read post]
13 May 2018, 2:20 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
United States, 347 U.S. 227, 230 (1954), requires trial judges to “determine the circumstances, the impact thereof upon the juror, and whether or not it was prejudicial, in a hearing with all interested parties permitted to participate. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Halliburton, 667 F.3d 602 (5th Cir. 2012): In a very well reasoned Defense Base Act (“DBA”) decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit determined that the DBA is an employee’s exclusive remedy for injuries sustained during employment. [read post]